Libertine Transparency

As socialists, as sentient adults, Libertines want for a rule of law in the marketplace. The economy ought be governed by the law, not the market.

As libertarians, fundamentally against abject centralization of power because they are necessarily democratic in political arrangement, Libertines are so left and libertarian.

This transparency ought to be as obvious as the ambition of Libertines to manipulate and control the Democratic party by liberal dissent and critique. Democrats are necessarily authoritarians, as ought to be obvious and understood too, as the lack of virtue they share with Republicans.

Libertines are the most loyal among the liberal opposition to conservative and typically Republican politics.

As leftists the Libertine critique agrees with the rightist Libertarian critique which states the populist idea of socialism isn't at all socialism and is indeed fascism.

It is cult/occult mental health, medical insurance fraud, for a maladroit and autistic people to become dominant, normalize rape, hate crimes and make who ought to be second class citizens equal to first class citizens. The same thing occurred in Nazi Germany. It was rampant and genetic brain disease within a democracy that created Hitler's Germany.

That same brain diseased majority defines the politics of America today and there is no other group holding a different political philosophy to Libertines other than Libertarians who understand this nearly as well.

Populism has always been the peril for democracy because wisdom is rarely consensus opinion.

What is not obvious and never should be obvious is how individual Libertines fare for reputation with law enforcement, active military service, military veterans and those associated in healthcare or government service.

Service is seen by Libertines to be an act of love and unless the Libertine is also an exhibitionist, they owe no transparency for that. They merely owe political transparency--to speak plainly about politics.

Again, whatever service record, reputation or lack thereof a Libertine has with people affiliated with military or public service should not be transparent. The Libertine is a transparent citizen who does not muddle their personal life with their service life. They insist their literacy qualifies the importance of their political positions and no other form of status can compare for importance when speaking to politics.

For people in the services the term "on Liberty" has a special meaning synonymous with time off or a vacation, leisure. To the Libertine, their time is more than that although one would hope to make it look so easy--for service to love in society to be so pleasurable and political.

There are certainly enough people without capacity for empathy for others. Libertine empathy transcends the two party system. Libertine empathy is extreme empathy in juxtaposition to those without any empathy. It is their empathy, second only to their literacy, with which the Libertine practices politics.

There is a natural draw both Libertarians, who lean economically conservative, and other liberal groups which resist the authoritarianism of the Democratic party, have for Libertines.

Put another way, to be a Libertine in society will likely produce rather immediate political allies. Regardless of anyone's political angle, the objectivity and empathy of the Libertine mind makes it attractive to people from most other political persuasions. 

Libertines, by power of political attraction according to their literacy, may companion with or direct libertarian conservatives, green liberals, conservative conservationists, independents and other parties living in the shadow of the two party duopoly-plutocracy or this Republic with it's oligarchs.

It is almost as if other political philosophies are unnatural or manufactured philosophies on how human beings ought to be ruled while the Libertine understands how people are naturally ruled. This is their role in society.

Libertines are power brokers with legitimate influence in both and most other political parties.

If royalty were stripped of all political authority in a democracy, Libertines would be those then citizen nobles.

To the extent the Libertine actualizes a political life, transparently, is the extent they as individuals can and should influence authoritarians--both Democrats and Republicans.

Libertines command a natural respect when they are both humbled by populist ideas and shamelessly point out their prejudice or lack of scientific and rational validity. 

The Libertarian critique is a minority report, at most. Most conservatives are not also Libertarians. The Libertarian caucus in the GOP is a smaller caucus albeit with solidarity.

The Libertine critique is borderline occult, privileged or primary source information in a liberal spectrum with more propaganda than information and what information there is to be found is usually from a secondary source. The Libertine critique is perhaps the most rare liberal critique.

Authoritarians are by nature overly concerned with their herd mentality be that what it may, and maintaining or adapting their populist narrative or group think. They are more or less obsessed with that.

Truly, to be a Libertine is to be a citizen elected officials want to know and associate with because their views on various issues are especially useful given their objectivity and empathy. Objectivity isn't something much appreciated by people with different political biases, worldviews.

It is probable Libertines will be treated like a commodity, or objects, by people holding other political philosophies and especially those working to effect authoritarian politics.

Naturally, objectivity like participation in reality is useful so too then Libertines are useful to government officials--typically more useful than antagonistic. They should not, however, be so useful to become objectified as tools and when they are, they ought break that political alliance.

Perhaps the only unbreakable alliance is the deep and historical Libertine alliance as shared between many people from both American and French civilizations.

Its this Libertine mentality as described on this blog, which speak to the best reasons for the history of French-American brotherhood and friendship. The Libertines are probably the people who connect the two civilizations the most.

It is the Libertine spirit and transparency both French and American people have validated, more so than people from other civilizations.

Indeed, the French and American civilizations when not corrupted by their own populists, best define and promote Liberty throughout the world. It is tragic how seldom the Libertine influence in both civilizations overrides the populist influence.

In this way, there is also a transparent cultural privilege for Libertines. Both American and French governments ought to be more pliable for the political manipulations or to the political will of the Libertine.

They have been, historically, more so than others. Newer to this fraternity and yet with a uniquely sincere devotion to literacy, is the Russian Federation. To the extent more Libertines from more civilizations realize themselves in their societies, the more probable and lasting peace and prosperity for all societies.

The Libertine benefits from multicultural exchange and is ultimately, politics aside, a humanist.